Dipped In Cream
22Jul/102

Courtney and Kurt Burned Marc Jacobs’ Clothes Back in the Day

Remember THIS?

On the Marc (when he was DOUGHY) Jacobs

It's no surprise that Grunge's King and Queen weren't too happy about designer Marc Jacobs making what they wore on a daily basis fashionable for the masses. Back in 1992, at the height of the Grunge movement, Marc was head designer at Perry Ellis and decided to capitalize on trend of flannel shirts and Doc Martens boots. The collection wasn't a success and actually got him fired for Perry Ellis in 1993.

Wait. THIS crap got Marc Jacobs FIRED in 1993? Durrrr.

Jacobs sent some pieces to Mr. and Mrs. Cobain, and of course them being them, they trashed it all. In an interview with Women's Wear Daily, Courtney said, "Marc sent me and Kurt his Perry Ellis Grunge Collection....we burned it. We were punkers, we didn't like that kind of thing."

Umm. Court actually looks a little bit hot here. Just sayin'.

I'm sure she wished she would have kept it. Vintage Marc, hello! Courtney just launched a new fashion website, WhatCourtneyWoreToday.com.

The craziness continues.

Written by: Brittani

17Jul/101

Pamela Anderson for PETA…sort of.

By:  Cate K.


Voila, Pam Anderson’s new poster for PETA.

It features the one-time Baywatch blonde carved up into little portions in a butcher-style diagram and come with a caption that reads: 'All animals have the same parts. Have a heart – go vegetarian.'

The ad won’t be shown in the famously liberal city of Montreal, though; PETA was denied a permit to publicly launch their latest campaign after officials got a sneak peek. A member of the city’s film and TV commission said, in an email to PETA, that “It is not so much controversial as it goes against all principles public organizations are fighting for in the everlasting battle of equality between men and women.”

The buxom Canamerican has been in several PETA ads and events, and has been a vocal supporter of their work over the years.  Pammy’s currently in Montreal hosting a gala at the annual Just For Laughs comedy festival.

While she snarked at the city’s decision via a formal statement (she called it “surprisingly puritanical”), PETA Senior Vice President Dan Mathews said "I think that city officials are confusing 'sexy' with 'sexist.” Not so, according to city officials.

Montreal’s film commissioner Daniel Bissonnette was quick to point out that “we're working for an organization where we're getting reminded on a daily basis that we should work in a sexism-free environment and that equality between men and women and the image of women is very important.”

Bureaucracy or sanity? Righteousness or righteous self-promotion? Sincerity or hypocrisy?

Your turn, Dipped In Cream readers.

Written by: Diva Julia

6Jul/103

More Madonna for Dolce & Gabbana Fall/Winter 2010 – Beautiful

All photos for Dolce & Gabbana by Steven Klein

I must say, these photos are incredible.  I love the "story" of a big Italian family, with a sultry woman "of a certain age", who clearly still has It.

Madonna looks gorgeous (sure, Photoshopped, but who ISN'T?).  I love the earthiness of these photos.

Is it just me?

Written by: Diva Julia

22Jun/101

Lady Madonna…We should ALL look this good at 52.

Nice rack. Cute boy. Lucky Star.

Madonna being playful for Dolce and Gabbana/Fall 2010

DivaJulia appreciates seeing Madge's chin(s)...and the shade she's throwin'.

L'invecchiamento, Photoshopped e bellissima Madonna.

These shots are taken from the Dolce & Gabbana photo shoot Madge did back in April -not the sunnies one (though looking at those pictures, it isn't hard to tell where Gaga gets her style inspiration) -but for the chi-chi Italian label's 2010 Fall/Winter collection. This may or may not have been around the time she had a little something done to her face. Really? I don't care.  It's not like she looks radically different (c'mon, she does not) nor is she trying to force some homogenized, Montagesque, Countess-Blandula-look onto her features. The Italiante features are still intact: the dark, large Latin eyes, the angular brow and chin, the full mouth. Here is a fine, fit 52-year-old fab-o woman keeping her sh*t together, and, if I may say so, doing it very, very well.

Also? Nice rack.

People are sniping over the Photoshopping. But I don't see anyone -apart from Diva Julia, actually -calling out Gaga for that Rolling Stone cover.  This might come as a shock, but, it must be stated: the entire music/movie/fashion/celeb world relies on Photoshop. Men, women, kids, even pets. Who created this?  Us?  Them?  We're back to the chicken/egg argument.  Maybe being less harsh on older women is a start in broadening our perspectives and expectations; if we demand "au natural" from Madonna, we ought to demand it from all of D&G's campaigns, and, more broadly, from every single fashion designer, retailer, band, entertainer, performer ... everyone.  And no one -repeat, no one -will be ugly, but simply unique and individual.  No?  Fantasy, you say?  It only takes one person to change their perception. I adore the non-Photoshopped photos myself; she's just beautiful, though I'd love to hand her a facecloth to see the skin and not the makeup. That, alas, feels like a tall order.

When it comes to actual plastic surgery, we expect our performers to look a specific way, and certainly Madonna is well-aware of the scales being tipped toward youth in the Western beauty stakes -especially when it comes to women. Some ladies choose the odd nip and tuck to complement their aging features -they're not "holding on to their youth(s)", forpitysake, they're doing maintenance. Just as there's nothing wrong with getting old, there's nothing wrong with a few fixings here and there, either.  Minor keys, not major lifts (to borrow from Leonard Cohen) are what makes for aging gracefully. Madonna is a perfect example of this.

Kudos, bella.  I hope you get many boys to carry your groceries. When you're done, send them my way.  I have that very same damn dress for a start --and the rack.   I'm working on the wrinkle correction.   Honest.

Photos (via Celebitchy)

Written by: Catherine

21Jun/105

Lady Gaga, Really? Put some clothes on, forpitysake! THAT would be more shocking.

Lady Gaga takes her panites out to the ballgame. Photo: Getty Images

Lady Gaga once again makes me question my own sanity, appearing at a Yankees game wearing nothing but a jersey over a bra and underwear.  It's been pretty hot where I am--in the 90's for the past two weeks,  but I didn't realize New York was also going through a heat wave.  That's the only reason I could think of as to why Gaga would leave the house in what most people sleep in. Yeah I know, it's her schtick, but it's getting pretty old, and frankly quite stank. She  boozed it up with some friends and reportedly fondled her breasts while making a spectacle of herself.  " Take me out to the ballgame ", indeed.

She somehow made Gaga way to the clubhouse, where she was reportedly banned. However a spokesman for the team said she, and other celebrities are never banned from the clubhouse. The Yanks lost (boooo!) which means that no one, not even Open Your Heart era Madonna, is allowed down there post game. Now if I walked outside in that I would be picked up for indecent exposure, or even prostitution, but it's Lady Gaga right!   We all want to see her naked!

Anyways...here Gaga on the cover of the latest Rolling Stone, just in case you haven't had enough--but this time we have a GUN bra.  Yeah.  Uh huh.

Bang Bang, Baby. Photo: Terry Richardson (of course)

Oh my God, Becky. Look at her  Photoshopped butt (to paraphrase Sir Mix-a-Lot).

Written by: Diva Julia

15Jun/102

Julia Roberts, avec beaucoup de fard pour Lancome. As IF.

Riiiight.

Yes. I'm beating the dead horse concernant pas fard et beaucoup de fard et de Julia Roberts. Am I coming in clear?  Here.  Let's just do it this way, shall we?

Okay. That's more like it. There's our Julia Roberts.

Who wouldn't love to see themselves all farded up and photoshopped within an inch of their lives...to look flawless like this snip is doing here--for a $20 MILLION DOLLAR paycheck.

No.  Thankyouverymuch.

Wait.  What am I? Crazy?? Of course I would!

Written by: Diva Julia

19May/103

What in Photoshop HELL is this? Angelina’s SALT poster is crap!

What in the WORLD?

I didn't realize Salt was an anime feature.   You know, if there is one woman on this ever-lovin' planet who does NOT need her face photoshopped to bloody death, it would be Angelina Jolie.  What the eff is going on with this new poster?  Here is the poster I've actually seen in theaters...

Better choice.

Yes, of course, this one isn't entirely un-photoshopped, but come ON.  Angie at least looks like a human, rather than like a shitty oil-pastel drawing left next to a hedge by some deranged fan, forpitysake.  (I'm on to you, Aniston.)

Written by: Diva Julia

3May/102

Madonna – Interview Magazine PHOTOS & VIDEO

Madonna - Photography Marcus Piggott, Mert Alas

Still with the crucifix?

"Bad Girl...drunk by 6?"

Madonna, is that the same top you wore in the "Vogue" video?

These photographs by the legendary photographers Marcus Piggott and Mert Alas appear in the May issue of Interview Magazine, (along with an interview by director Gus Van Sant), and they are Madonna at her best.

Now.  Having said that, all women of a "certain age" should follow Madge's lead and always have your eyes closed in any photo--and make sure said photo is printed in black and white.  Oh, and Photoshopped within an inch of your life.  I should know.  I always make sure I follow those oh, so important rules.  OH!  And if at all possible, try to have an artistic blur effect added to the photo, as such:

I'm on to you, Sister.

NO.  I'm not comparing myself to Madonna, so don't EVEN.  I'm just giving some helpful tips for a lovely and dramatic photo, that YOU, TOO can produce in the convenience of your own home!

False eyelashes and cleavage are an added PLUS!

Madonna?  I know of what I speak, and I've spilled all of your secrets to a good photo.

Written by: Diva Julia

30Apr/102

Sex and the City 2 New Poster. Wow.

Oh. Mah. GYAAAAH.

What. The GOTdamhell?   I'll bet Kim is happy with her, um, image.  But Sarah Jessica?  I know I'm happy about her face, but I can't imagine she's too excited.  As if her face wasn't LONNNG enough.  Say it with me: Sarah Jessica?  Why the long face?  Holy crap.

Kentucky Derby Contender

You know what?  I love this time of year. Neeeeeigh.

Written by: Diva Julia

6Apr/103

Kimora Lee Simmons new fragrance, “Dare” ads cause Photoshop to crash worldwide.

Holy hell, Kimora.

OhforpitySAKE, Kimora. I love that you've been chatting with Paula Abdul about how to lengthen them legs.   Old girl was the first one to do it back in the day, thinking no one would notice ("Promise of a New Day", anyone?). Yeah, as IF...just like you thought we wouldn't notice that suddenly you have legs like a Bratz Doll, and somehow your neck-flaps are missing.  Hmmmm.

Can you guys believe this crap? Sigh.

Written by: Diva Julia